Operations leaders struggle to utilize data effectively. Just 36% are 'very satisfied' with their ability to combine and draw insights from data across multiple business functions, according to a global KPMG survey of 1,300 Finance and Operations leaders. Further down the data-use chain, only 38% are 'very satisfied' with their ability to make informed decisions based on data. Furthermore, just 44% are 'very satisfied' with their ability to use data to support financial and operational analytics.

We spoke to two operations leaders to understand how they are harnessing new technology and data to bring key business processes up to the mark:

Centralized data, local execution: how DXC is rewiring procure-to-pay

Global IT services and consulting company DXC has more than 130,000 employees and generated US$17.7bn in revenue in 2021. It spends billions of dollars on IT equipment and services every year. Transforming how this procured and paid for (the 'procure-to-pay' process) is a key priority for Chris Drumgoole, who joined as COO in 2021.

Just

43%

of operations leaders are 'very satisfied' with their degree of visibility of their entire supply chain.

“We had, and still do have, numerous purchasing tools and systems around the world, some of which are highly automated, and some highly manual,” explains Drumgoole. “This meant that we could not get a holistic view of how much we spend and who we spend it with. This leads to increased costs, because you spend more for the same commodity with one supplier than another, without knowing it. It was also difficult to get an idea of where delivery delays were affecting supply.”

To correct this, the business is centralizing its procurement infrastructure, enabling its operations team to generate instantly analyzable data that allows comparison of different prices, delivery times and geographies. Once DXC can lay out its insights in a graduated framework, purchasers will be able to make better-informed purchasing decisions and -- potentially -- negotiate more favorable terms.

Importantly, local purchasers will still have autonomy around procurement. “We want global visibility, but local execution, because smaller local purchasers have greater agility and can get a better deal than purchasers in a big central team. That said, centralized systems also give us control to an extent, which enables us to comply more easily with legal directives such as sanctions.”

Close collaboration between Operations and Finance is essential to the restructuring of the procure-to-pay system. “Operations teams focus on how we can drive efficiencies; how can we get key equipment more quickly; and how we get clarity on our supply chain,” explains Drumgoole.

Only

44%

of operations leaders say their procure-to-pay process is fully connected across finance and operations.

“Finance supports this, but also looks at how these changes might impact costs. The teams are also integrated for day-to-day purchases. The team that cuts the cheque or issues the wire is located in Finance, but they are integrated very closely with the team in Operations that makes the purchase. It's seamless.”

Logistically and technically, implementing any new organization-wide system in a global business will always be challenging. However, Drumgoole admits it has been cultural issues that have presented the largest obstacles. “The company's mission statement has always been to put the customer first, and so, naturally, our employees were nervous that these changes would impede their ability to serve their customers,” he explains. “You need to go team by team, almost person by person, and explain that the changes you are making will benefit them and our customers in the long run. It's proving successful, so far.”

Mondelēz International: data strengthens the links in the supply chain

Frank Cervi is Chief Supply Chain Strategy Officer, Mondelēz International (Nasdaq: MDLZ). The business empowers people to snack right in over 150 countries around the world. With 2021 net revenues of approximately $29 billion, Mondelēz is leading the future of snacking with iconic global and local brands such as Oreo, belVita, Cadbury Dairy Milk and Trident gum. Cervi explains how new data and advanced technology are helping the business take demand forecasting to a new level of precision.

Less than half (43%)

of operations leaders are very satisfied with their ability to leverage financial and operational data from across the organization for planning purposes

For Mondelēz, it is vital to predict accurately demand levels for its goods. These projections will determine the scale and timing of production for each product line and will be used to program high- and low-intensity periods for each factory. Cervi leads the efforts under way to transform the company's supply-chain planning system. Optimizing the accuracy of these forecasts is a top priority.

“Historically, these forecasts were determined by manually analyzing hundreds of spreadsheets and then going through lots of internal discussions,” he says. “Now, we're using a set of sophisticated, machine-generated algorithms to generate these estimates. It compares everything you forecast in the past to what actually transpired.”

Currently, the algorithms are set to analyze internal data, such as historical demand levels. They also determine the optimum conditions for the implementation of current promotions, using external data such as weather forecasts and the timing of major sporting or other entertainment events when there are spikes in demand for snacks and beverages.

As a result of all this data analysis, the company has managed to improve the accuracy of its two-month-ahead demand signals from 70% (which Cervi says was the industry benchmark) to around 75%. The benefits are even greater for longer-term forecasting, a notoriously difficult undertaking given the wider range of possible outcomes.

But Cervi believes there is even greater scope to improve accuracy by systematically collating and feeding in larger supplies of data. “In the future, I imagine being able to scrape all point-of-sale data from supermarkets, as well as social-media metrics, to understand whether one of our brands is trending. This could help us to understand demand surges and generally fine-tune our forecasting.”

Surprisingly, obtaining the data and feeding it into the analytics engine is not the greatest hurdle. Rather, Cervi highlights challenges in budget allocation. “Securing budget for these types of digital investments can be challenging as we all want to understand the return on investment and the payback period. But, with digital investments, you're often not 100% clear on the benefits, yet you know you need to make it or you will be left behind. We managed to overcome this hurdle and secured the investment because we have a visionary head of supply chain and a dynamic Finance team who worked together to understand the benefits of the investment, both financial and in attracting and retaining talent.”

Key lessons

In both of these examples, close collaboration between Operations and Finance proved vital, both in planning the refinements and understanding the motivations and intentions behind them.

However, this is something that many businesses struggle with today: just 43% of surveyed Operations leaders are 'very satisfied' with the extent to which they collaborate with their counterpart in Finance. And if those that lead these functions do not collaborate, neither will their teams: just 46% of Operations leaders are 'very satisfied' with the degree of collaboration between finance and operations team members.

Read our main report (PDF 587KB) to find out how Operations and Finance can work together for mutual advantage and to the benefit of the business as a whole.

   

Get in touch